Love, P
Coyne, J.C., and you may D.An effective. Smith. 1994. Lovers coping with myocardial infarction: Contextual position towards diligent self-efficacy. Log from Members of the family Mindset 8:1-thirteen.
Fincham, F.D., T.N. Bradbury, and you may C.K. Scott. 1990. Knowledge inside and you can T. N. Bradbury, eds. The latest psychology of relationship. Ny: Guilford Drive.
Gottman, J.M. 1993. The new spots regarding conflict engagement, escalation, and you may cures into the relationship telecommunications: A great longitudinal view of four form of couples. Diary out of Contacting and you may Clinical Therapy 61(1):6-15.
Gottman, J.M., S. Carrere, C. Swanson and you can J. Coan. 2000. React to “Regarding research to help you intervention.” Journal out of ily 62(1):265-273.
Gottman, J.M., J. Coan, S. Carrere, and you may C. Swanson. 1998. Anticipating relationship joy and you will stability out of newlywed interactions. Log out of ily sixty(1):5-22.
Holtzworth-Munroe, An excellent., and you can N. S. Jacobson. 1985. Causal attributions out of married people: Whenever manage it choose causes? Precisely what do they conclude when they do? Diary out-of Identification and you will Public Therapy -1412.
Kendall, S., and you may D. Tannen. 2001. Discourse and Gender. Into the D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and you can H. Hamilton, eds. This new Handbook out of Discourse Data. 548-567. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Editors.
Lerner, H. 2002. This new moving from connection: Just how to keep in touch with people when you find yourself angry, hurt, scared, furious, insulted, betrayed or eager. Ny: HarperCollins Writers.
Stanley, S., T. Bradbury, and you may H. . Structural defects throughout the link regarding basic research with the wedding in order to input getting partners. Record regarding ily 62(1):256-264.
Mention this particular article
Wiley, Angela R. 2007. Connecting given that a couple: Communication knowledge to have fit relationships. Brand new Message board to own Relatives and you will Consumer Items, several (1).
A interaction and you will disease-resolving event was crucial for dating achievements; however, match relationships wanted far more than simply a great communication and you will problem-fixing knowledge. There was a common more-dependence on this type of because “royal path to love and you will an enduring, delighted matrimony”(Gottman and you can Gold 1999, 8). This type of enjoy are essential not adequate to have solid relationship and you will is going to be contextualized as part of the huge couples system. (For details about other secret methods so you’re able to strengthening and you can maintaining a great suit relationships, understand the National Extension Dating and Wedding Studies Model,
In her publication, The newest Moving out of Connection, specialist Harriet Lerner (2002) talks about which have an actual sound in very important intimate dating. She argues you to a crucial part of getting a genuine voice are “publicly shar[ing] proficiency in addition to dilemmas and you can vulnerability (Lerner 2002, 3). Her enough time-term clinical practice means that it is intimate telecommunications entails partners completely hearing one another and you may asking clarifying inquiries that allow him or her understand each other much deeper. Effortlessly sexual partners are in a position condition their emotions and you can view, even though those people vary from the partner’s.
Negative perceptions. Negative translation patterns tend to are present whenever couples believe the brand new worst rather of the greatest from the both (Fincham, Bradbury, and you may Scott, 1990; Holtzworth-Munroe and Jacobson 1985). For example couples are definitely perhaps not “keeping they confident.” They could take part in a rough initiate-right up bid considering nazwa uЕјytkownika chatki an awful translation otherwise expectation. They may turn up against otherwise away from their spouse when reacting so you can a quote. Lovers that happen to be more likely to negative interpretations might rather is funny a confident cause of the newest other people’s behavior and you can discussing them with their mate. Such as for example, in place of, “You probably did perhaps not remove the newest garbage as you must generate me annoyed,” Jim you’ll say to his girlfriend, Peg, “I am certain your did not take out the latest trash since you imagine I would convey more to add to new is.”
Coan, J., J. Gottman, J. Babcock, and you can N. Jacobson. 1997. Battering and also the men getting rejected from infiuence out-of people. Competitive Decisions -388.